through the because-farmers dept
Over 2 yrs ago, we composed about a definitely insane proposition in Florida that sought in order to make it a felony to photograph farms without permission. The bill attempted to position it as “protecting farm property that is intellectual” but every person knew the actual reason farmers were upset about animal liberties activists photographing and videotaping animal cruelty and revealing it to your world. We had not heard a great deal more about that until recently. A month . 5 ago, regarding the Media had a segment regarding how these kinds of bills had been showing up much more states, now the NY days has been doing a big article on just how these “ag-gag” guidelines are increasingly being pushed by lobbyists greatly impacted by big farm groups.
It appears that the positioning of those bills has relocated far from “protecting farmer IP” and up to claiming that animal liberties activists are involved in terrorism for exposing cruelty that is animal. Now, we truly genuinely believe that some animal liberties groups go way overboard in their promotions, though they often times just make themselves l k silly once they do so. But these rules simply appear crazy, and a restriction that is clear First Amendment liberties.
However a dozen or more state legislatures have experienced an alternative effect
They proposed or enacted bills that could allow it to be illegal to covertly videotape livestock farms, or make application for a job at one without disclosing ties to animal rights groups. They have additionally drafted measures to need videos that are such be provided with towards the authorities very nearly straight away, which activists say would thwart any significant undercover research of big factory farms.
ALEC (the American Legislative Exchange Council), team famous for composing legislation for users of Congress, features a “draft bill” along these lines, which contends that your time and effort is to prevent tries to make use of images and video to “defame the facility or its owner.” That’s insulting. To start, we have defamation rules. If farm owners are defamed, allow them to utilize those regulations. 2nd, the fact is a defense that is absolute defamation, if they truly are having a photo that accurately represents what are you doing, it is difficult to observe that could, at all, be any form of defamation. Third, and most importantly, simply because one might utilize some tactic to defame somebody (even if it’s highly not likely) that’s no reason, at all, for trying to ban the activity entirely.
In the end, it is legal efforts such as this which make people specially cynical about the process that is political. It is pretty clear that there is no valid reason for such legislation. Instead, the purpose that is entire to guard some farmers that don’t want their methods exposed.
Many thanks for reading this Techdirt post. These days, we really appreciate you giving us your time with so many things competing for everyoneвЂ™s attention. We work hard every to put quality content out there for our community day.
Techdirt is among the few remaining media outlets that are truly independent. We would not have a huge business in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites вЂ” especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us.
While other sites have resorted to paywalls, enrollment requirements, and advertising that is increasingly annoying/intrusive we’ve always kept Techdirt open and open to anybody. But in purchase to continue doing so, we truly need your support. We provide many different ways for our visitors to aid us, from direct contributions to special subscriptions and merchandise that is c l and every small bit helps. Thank you.